[col. writ. 2/7/09] (c) '09 Mumia Abu-Jamal
In Pennsylvania's Luzerne County, there are 9 judges of the Court of Common Pleas. Two of them just pleaded guilty to a conspiracy to convict and sentence juveniles to a private prison, so that they could get kickbacks from the prison's builders and owners.
According to published accounts, Judge Mark A. Ciavarella and Senior Judge Michael T. Conahan sent hundreds of boys and girls to the private facility, and pocketed some $2.5 million in kickbacks.
This was accomplished not merely because of the venal greed of the judges, but because virtually none of the children were provided with legal representation.
When the Philadelphia-based Juvenile Law Center filed a petition in the PA Supreme Court calling the county's practice of adjudicating and sentencing some 250 kids to jail without legal representation unconstitutional, the state's highest court denied the petition on Jan. 8, 2009. To make matters even worse, recently filed criminal information states that the 2 judges used their power and influence in the county to de-fund the county juvenile facility, precisely as they were steering kids to the private jail (boy -- talk about privatization!).
Nearly a month later, the state's highest court changed their minds, vacating the denial.
What transpired in the interim?
Well, for one thing, the 2 judges provisionally pleaded guilty to federal charges of honest wire service fraud.
Hundreds of children get socked into jail, after demonstrably unconstitutional proceedings with no legal representation, and the state's highest court doesn't even raise an eyebrow.
The media reports on this outrage, and the PA Supreme Court expresses little interest.
This is the nature of judging these days, when even kids are expendable fodder for the prison industrial complex.
Luzerne County is the state's 10th largest county, with just over 300,000 souls.
At least 22% of their judges have admitted being corrupt, in the sordid business of selling the freedom and well-being of poor children for profit.
--(c) '09 maj
{Sources: Legal Intelligencer, 2/3/09; 2/4/09.}
Monday, February 23, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment