Wednesday, October 08, 2008

Md. Police Put Activists' Names On Terror Lists

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/07/AR2008100703245_pf.html

Md. Police Put Activists' Names On Terror Lists
Surveillance's Reach Revealed

By Lisa Rein
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, October 8, 2008; A01

The Maryland State Police classified 53 nonviolent activists as terrorists
and entered their names and personal information into state and federal
databases that track terrorism suspects, the state police chief acknowledged
yesterday.

Police Superintendent Terrence B. Sheridan revealed at a legislative hearing
that the surveillance operation, which targeted opponents of the death penalty
and the Iraq war, was far more extensive than was known when its existence was
disclosed in July.

The department started sending letters of notification Saturday to the
activists, inviting them to review their files before they are purged from the
databases, Sheridan said.

"The names don't belong in there," he told the Senate Judicial Proceedings
Committee. "It's as simple as that."

The surveillance took place over 14 months in 2005 and 2006, under the
administration of former governor Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. (R). The former state
police superintendent who authorized the operation, Thomas E. Hutchins, defended
the program in testimony yesterday. Hutchins said the program was a bulwark
against potential violence and called the activists "fringe people."

Sheridan said protest groups were also entered as terrorist organizations in
the databases, but his staff has not identified which ones.

Stunned senators pressed Sheridan to apologize to the activists for the
spying, assailed in an independent review last week as "overreaching" by law
enforcement officials who were oblivious to their violation of the activists'
rights of free expression and association. The letter, obtained by The
Washington Post, does not apologize but admits that the state police have "no
evidence whatsoever of any involvement in violent crime" by those classified as
terrorists.

Hutchins told the committee it was not accurate to describe the program as
spying. "I doubt anyone who has used that term has ever met a spy," he told the
committee.

"What John Walker did is spying," Hutchins said, referring to John Walker
Jr., a communications specialist for the U.S. Navy convicted of selling secrets
to the Soviet Union. Hutchins said the intelligence agents, whose logs were
obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland as part of a lawsuit,
were monitoring "open public meetings." His officers sought a "situational
awareness" of the potential for disruption as death penalty opponents prepared
to protest the executions of two men on death row, Hutchins said.

"I don't believe the First Amendment is any guarantee to those who wish to
disrupt the government," he said. Hutchins said he did not notify Ehrlich about
the surveillance. Ehrlich spokesman Henry Fawell said the governor had no
comment.

Hutchins did not name the commander in the Division of Homeland Security and
Intelligence who informed him in March 2005 that the surveillance had begun.
More than a year later, after "they said, 'We're not getting much here,' "
Hutchins said he cut off what he called a "low-level operation."

But Sen. James Brochin (D-Baltimore County) noted that undercover troopers
used aliases to infiltrate organizational meetings, rallies and group e-mail
lists. He called the spying a "deliberate infiltration to find out every piece
of information necessary" on groups such as the Maryland Campaign to End the
Death Penalty and the Baltimore Pledge of Resistance. When Hutchins called their
members "fringe people," the audience of activists who filled the seats in the
hearing room in Annapolis sighed.

Some activists said yesterday that they have received letters; others said
they were waiting with anticipation to see whether they were on the state police
watch list.

Laura Lising of Catonsville, a member of the Baltimore Coalition Against the
Death Penalty, received her notification yesterday. She said she wants a hard
copy of her file, because she does not trust the police to purge it. "We need as
much protection as possible," she said.

Both Hutchins and Sheridan said the activists' names were entered into the
state police database as terrorists partly because the software offered limited
options for classifying entries.

The police also entered the activists' names into the federal
Washington-Baltimore High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area database, which tracks
suspected terrorists. One well-known antiwar activist from Baltimore, Max
Obuszewski, was singled out in the intelligence logs released by the ACLU, which
described a "primary crime" of "terrorism-anti-government" and a "secondary
crime" of "terrorism-anti-war protesters."

Sheridan said that he did not think the names were circulated to other
agencies in the federal system and that they are not on the federal government's
terrorist watch list. Hutchins said some names might have been shared with the
National Security Agency.

Although the independent report on the surveillance released last week said
that it was part of a broad effort by the state police to gather information on
protest groups across the state, Sheridan said the department is not aware of
any surveillance as "intrusive" as the spying on death penalty and war
opponents.

The police notified the protesters at the recommendation of former U.S.
attorney and state attorney general Stephen H. Sachs, who was appointed by Gov.
Martin O'Malley (D) to review the covert monitoring. In a report last week,
Sachs also recommended regulations that forbid such spying on protest groups
unless the state police chief believes it is justified.

"I can't imagine getting a letter that says, 'You've been classified as a
terrorist; come in and we'll tell about it,'" said Sen. Bryan W. Simonaire
(R-Anne Arundel). Two senators noted that they had been arrested years ago for
civil disobedience. Sen. Jennie Forehand (D-Montgomery) asked Sheridan, "Do you
have any legislators on your list?" The answer was no.

No comments: